Aside from the aforementioned coins, over 300 other Solana-based tokens have been stolen alongside a few non-fungible tokens (NFTs). As reported by Fortune, most of the influenced crypto wallets were being so-known as « hot wallets, » which signifies they have been connected to the online. These wallets are generally regarded as significantly less safe than « chilly wallets, » also acknowledged as « hardware wallets, » which do not need an net link and are more hard to compromise. In the case of the Solana assault, the adhering to three wallets saw the major losses: Phantom, Slope, and Have confidence in Wallet.
Austin Federa, the head of communications at the Solana Foundation, advised Fortune: « This does not appear to be a bug with Solana core code, but in computer software applied by various wallets popular amid consumers of the network. » This assertion is echoed throughout several publications that report that the hacker was ready to acknowledge the wallet-draining transactions on the behalf of the house owners of the account. The co-founder of Solana, Anatoly Yakovenko, claimed on Twitter that the hack could be a « offer chain assault, » which means the attacker focused a 3rd-occasion vendor as opposed to the Solana platform alone.
Even though gurus concerned in many ecosystems are hoping to assist Solana in stopping the attack, the common suggestions for consumers is to shift their resources to an offline wallet. Solana Status on Twitter said that there has been no evidence of hardware wallets being impacted. The exact same account is also envisioned to be putting up updates on the condition of things as new facts emerges.